Delbarton School · Morristown, NJEstablished 2025
Delbarton Satire Club
Our original logo

Our original logo was hand-drawn by our Art Director and cartoonist, Hironori Momonoi, to mark the founding of the Delbarton Satire Club in 2025.

The Green Onion.
A STUDENT-RUN SATIRE PUBLICATIONWednesday, November 4, 2026
THE GREEN ONION

The Newsroom

Newsroom
The Green Onion • Delbarton Satire Club
TitleAuthorDateStatusActions
NameRoleActions
New Article
THE CARTOON DESK

Publish an editorial cartoon

Original artwork, shown in its full aspect ratio.

Drag and drop your cartoon hereor click to choose an image
Cartoon upload preview

Images appear uncropped and without a watermark. You may leave the caption blank.

MEDIA

Cover image

Set the article and homepage crops separately.

Drop photo here or click to upload
or paste a URL below
Article Cover (when article is opened)
Drag to reposition  ·  scroll or slider to zoom
− + 100%
Brightness 100%
Contrast 100%
Saturation 100%
Homepage Card (thumbnail on the site)
Drag to reposition  ·  scroll or slider to zoom
− + 100%
Brightness 100%
Contrast 100%
Saturation 100%
STORY

Article body

Write and format the published story.

✓ Published!
Politicsright perspectiveFeatured

Internet Activists Officially Abolishes Due Process After Reading Instagram Post

Innocent Until Posted: The Rise of Social Media Justice. Truth now determined by likes, shares, and comment sections rather than evidence.

Internet Activists Officially Abolishes Due Process After Reading Instagram Post
The internet has decided that due process is unnecessary, and thousands of social media users have cracked a complex sexual assault case at (a prestigious) university by analysing Instagram stories, TikTok comments, and accounts with all caps. The controversy has begun after allegations have been made by a former student at ******* dubbed '**** ***,’ and social media users have taken it upon themselves to investigate and come to a verdict.

"Who would ever need a trial? Someone had a post with 40,000 likes! 40,000 people can’t be wrong, can they?" said student activist Madison Parker, who recently graduated with a degree in gender studies. Parker, a passionate justice seeker, has done lots of research into the case, including reading three Instagrams, two TikToks, and a very convincing comment section.

Some student groups have suggested that they should move to trial by Instagram poll. This means anyone accused of a crime will have 15 seconds to defend their case on their Instagram story. Proponents of trial by Instagram poll have argued that it will save billions of pounds of taxpayers' money. No one will need to pay for costly lawyers and lengthy investigations. Why take months to look at evidence when everyone on social media can find out who is guilty in less than 20 seconds?

However, some are not convinced. Critics have argued that finding who is guilty on social media may not be the fairest. "I don’t like that! So you think sexual assault is fine?" said Parker. A reporter attempted to explain that whilst they may take sexual assault allegations seriously, they think those accused should still have due process. Parker did not seem pleased with this answer and asked to be taken off the article.

Other legal scholars are concerned that people are making this an opinion-based issue when it has always been an evidence-based issue. Harvard law professor Andrew Fostiropoulos said that the courts have always needed evidence to convict someone. "It’s a very simple idea. Innocent until proven guilty. Somehow it’s become controversial," said Fostiropoulos.

Presumption of innocence has been a staple part of the American justice system for a long time, but some student activists think it’s time for an upgrade. "Due process existed before Instagram. We have evolved as a society, so we should use our technology to make judgments more advanced," said Parker.

Students have suggested abolishing juries as social media influencers are more credible. They argue that someone with hundreds of thousands of followers must be more trustworthy than 12 random people. "If someone has 200,000 followers, it’s obvious they are trusted to make decisions on important matters. Shouldn’t we trust them to decide court cases?" said one supporter.

Online commentators have made it clear that there is no middle ground in this situation. If you want to see evidence first, you’re expected to state your side. "There is no middle ground. You’re either with us or with them," said Brandon Ellis a campus activist. When asked if you could support the alleged victims but also stand up for the rights of those accused, Ellis thought for a moment and said: "That’s what a guilty person would say".

Despite the criticisms, they seem to think they have come up with a much more efficient system. Waiting for investigations and hearing both sides of the argument seems like a pointless waste of time when social media can give you instant answers. "They always tell me to wait for the facts. But I’ve already shared 12 stories about ESSAY not SA. I’m far too invested," said Parker.

At the time of publishing this article, thousands of internet users will be sharing their final verdict after watching a 30-second video called "EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW " made by an anonymous account with a cartoon frog as their profile picture. The video had no citations. The video gained 2.3 million likes.

Justice, apparently, has been served.
Published October 27, 2026 · SatireEmail

Reader Discussion

Loading comments…

About The Green Onion

This is the official website of the Delbarton Satire Club and its student-run publication, The Green Onion. Founded in 2025, we publish satire and editorial cartoons on politics, culture, sports, and current affairs from across the political spectrum.

Each article reflects its author’s perspective—not that of The Green Onion, the Satire Club, or Delbarton School.

Satire and fictional quotations: Unless explicitly identified as genuine and attributed to a source, all quotations, statements, dialogue, interviews, and other purported remarks appearing in The Green Onion are fabricated for satirical purposes. They should not be interpreted as actual statements by the individuals or organizations depicted.

The Green Onion is a noncommercial, student-run publication. We do not claim ownership of third-party photographs or images used in our publication. All rights and credit belong to their respective original creators and rights holders. Images are used for editorial, satirical, or illustrative purposes. Rights holders may contact us with attribution or removal concerns.

THE PEOPLE BEHIND THE ONION

Meet the Staff

← Staff

Edit My Photo
Your photo
Drop photo here or click to upload
or paste a URL below
✓ Saved!
New Staff Member
Drop photo or click to upload
or paste a URL below
Adjust the framing as it will appear on the public staff page.
✓ Saved!
ARTICLE MEDIA

Place photo