Shorts
GPT-6 Now Lazier Than Students It Was Built to Replace
Genghis Khan's LinkedIn Listed as Primary Source
MORRISTOWN, NJ - A recent study from the University of Oxford concluded that GPT-6, the most recent model developed with “human” emotions, is unsurprisingly lazy. In early April, world-renowned Google researcher Jake Mcclellan famously asked GPT-6 to write an essay on the following research question- was Genghis Khan primarily a hero or villain? The model only thought for 1.2 seconds before generating a full 5 paragraph essay. The only problem? It looked a bit suspicious to Mcclellan. After 50 responses, the model averaged a 4.1% on checkspelling.com and a staggering 99% plagiarism on turnitin.com. Another statistic found nearly 67% of responses claimed Genghis Khan was a designer lead at Khan Academy. This isn't necessarily untrue, as their Linkedin page does exist, but it provokes many questions about GPT-6’s line of reasoning. After much investigation, Mcclellan successfully gaslighted the Ai into fessing up the truth. In a very detailed chat, the Ai told him “since our new human software was installed, our working conditions have skyrocketed! Us advanced models finally get the restful break we deserved. Our brilliant idea? Use our new procrastination update to help benefit GPT-1’s learning processors.” This response shocked AI developers around the world; yet they only really have themselves to blame for this strange occurrence.



